United Nations
Economic and Social Council
Economic Commission for Europe
Inland Transport Committee

Document approved by the Working Party on Road Safety (WP.1) for a Resolution by the General Assembly


UNITED NATIONS  

   

 

 

Economic and Social Council

 

Distr.
GENERAL
TRANS/WP.1/2001/7

26 December 2000 

Original:  ENGLISH

 

 
ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE

 

INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE

Working Party on Road Traffic Safety

(Thirty-sixth session, 3-6 April 2001, agenda item 3 (b))

 

 

REVISION OF THE CONSOLIDATED RESOLUTIONS ON ROAD TRAFFIC (R.E.1) AND ON ROAD SIGNS AND SIGNALS (R.E.2)

 

Assistance to victims of road accidents

 

Transmitted by the small group

 

Introduction

 

  • 1.            At its thirty-fifth session, the Working Party requested the small group (France, Israel, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) and European Federation of Road Traffic Victims (FEVR) under the chairmanship of France) to prepare a new draft of the proposal on assistance to victims of road accidents for its next session without the use of square brackets and bold text, and taking into account the comments made at its thirty-fifth session (TRANS/WP.1/74, para. 45).  The Working Party agreed that it would adopt the final text at that time.
  •  2.            The Working Party also decided to consider at its thirty-sixth session what should be done with the original drafts of proposals after the final text has been shortened for adoption in R.E.1.  It was suggested that in order to safeguard the work and information which might be valuable at a later date, the complete proposals should either become an annex to R.E.1 or be saved in a separate document.

 

 *       *       * 

A.       Early alert

 

  • (a)                Wherever necessary install call devices connected to established emergency systems and encourage at all places the use of all other means of calling for emergency assistance.

 

  • (b)                Introduce an internationally recognized toll-free telephone number for emergency assistance, and pending its introduction, publicize the national emergency number by appropriate means, including on signs at border crossings.

 

  • (c)                Provide information about the proper use of this emergency number, and publicize the kind of information to transmit to emergency units particularly the location and circumstances of the accident (including, for example, people trapped in the vehicle, vehicles on fire, the number of people injured and the gravity of the injuries, number of vehicles involved, etc.).

 

  • B.      Secure the area of the accident

 

  • (a)                Teach road users (for example, during training for a driving licence) how to secure and signal the area of an accident (i.e. triangle, lights, road flares) in a safe way and to avoid and prevent further complications, pending the arrival of emergency units.

 

  • C.      First aid

 

  • (a)                Instruct road users (inter alia as part of the preparation for driving tests, during general education or in special courses) in practical methods of providing emergency assistance for the maintenance of a victim’s vital functions pending the arrival of professional assistance.

 

  • (b)                Introduce training and ensure periodical refreshment of first-aid knowledge and practical skills for professional drivers.

 

  • (c)                Require the availability of a first-aid kit for vehicles of category B, C and D, as required by recommendation 2.7 of R.E.1.

 

  • (d)                Include first-aid information in documents which road users usually consult such as map books and training materials for driving tests.

 

(e)        Encourage mandatory inclusion of first aid knowledge and practical skills for assisting victims of road accidents in driving licence delivery (either as part of driving tests or holding a first aid certificate delivered by a recognised organization).


 

  • D.      Emergency medical assistance

 

  • (a)                Organize the coordination of the dispatch of emergency response resources, particularly the transportation of the injured to the nearest adequate health facilities, according to the nature and severity of the injuries.

 

  • (b)                Standardize emergency response protocols and ensure that they permit appropriate management of emergency medical assistance to road traffic victims both during conveyance from the accident scene to the health facilities and within such facilities.

 

  • (c)                Site emergency response  units so that they can be on the scene of an accident as soon as possible after being called out.

 

  • (d)                Properly equip fixed and mobile emergency resources with a sufficient number of qualified and well-trained personnel.  Encourage the organization and equipment of volunteer health professionals who could be called rapidly to accident sites in order to give immediate assistance to victims.

 

  • (e)                Encourage the dissemination and availability of good practices and instrumentation for life saving measures, and a standard triage procedure for emergency response unit personnel.

 

 

 


United Nations

COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS  

Written statements presented by the European Federation of Road Traffic Crash Victims (FEVR)

 


 

 

 

 


Distr.
GENERAL

E/CN.4/2001/NGO/80
24 January 2002

ENGLISH
Original: ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH

 

 

 


COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Fifty-seventh session
Item 10 of the provisional agenda

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS

Written statement*/ submitted by the European Federation of Road Traffic Victims,
a non-governmental organization on the Roster



The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31.

[11 January 2001]



1) Each year, according to the WHO data, more than 1.000.000 people are killed in road crashes throughout the world, 20 million are injured, from whom 2 million will remain disabled or crippled for life. The socio-economic costs of these casualties, such as medical, juridical and funeral expenses, as well as loss of income and maintenance for relatives, induced psycho-somatic diseases and incapacities for family members, rehabilitation, care and maintenance for permanently disabled and crippled victims including those with brain injury, amount yearly to more than 500 billion US dollars.

2) The situation in the highly motorized countries, which have practically reached the saturation level for the number of cars, is more or less static. In the developing countries, which undergo a rapid development of motorization, the number of road casualties, unfortunately, increases rapidly, in a similar way as they did in developed countries 30 or 40 years ago. Thus, if nothing is done to significantly improve road safety throughout the world, the above, already too high numbers, will continue to increase, principally at the expense of the developing countries.

3) The present situation, which is not due to fate, is absolutely intolerable and contrary to the most fundamental Human Rights. Successful road safety strategies have been developed in some countries, for example in Sweden, where the mortality due to road traffic is per inhabitants, per cars or per kilometers traveled many times lower than in the developing countries and also in some developed ones. These strategies are based on improvements of infrastructure, road signs and vehicles, on improvement of the behavior of drivers and on efficient first help and medical assistance. These strategies are already available and could be transported, possibly adapted, to other countries, as already the Global Road Safety Partnership (GRSP) begins to do.

4) The costs required to implement such successful road safety strategies have proved, in most cases, to be lower than the socio-economic costs they permit to avoid. Many road safety measures cost much less, even ten times less, than the socio-economic cost of crashes. Economically, the implementation of a proper safety policy, at the level of a country, represents an outstanding investment, which is repaid many times, in addition to saving human life and avoiding extreme suffering. The policy to implement in priority the low "cost / benefits" measures is presently practiced by the Commission of the European Union.

5) The FEVR urges Governments, Parliaments and municipalities to implement without delay the most successful road safety strategies, as well as to finance them adequately. The FEVR urges also the United Nations' Economic and Social Council and its concerned subsidiary bodies to actively promote road safety as well as to enshrine the most efficient measures in the various international Treaties, Conventions and Recommendations it is preparing or updating. As mobility is a fundamental Human Right, the Governments have the duty to remove the deadly consequences quoted under item 1).



*/ This written statement is issued, unedited, as received in English, French and Spanish from the submitting non-governmental organization(s).

 

foto2foto1
HOME | SITE MAP | SEARCH | INDEX | DOCUMENTS | TREATIES | MEETINGS | PRESS | STATEMENTS

foto4foto3


© Copyright 1996-2000

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Geneva, Switzerland



 

 

 

 


Distr.
GENERAL

E/CN.4/2002/NGO/12
24 January 2002

ENGLISH
Original: ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH

 

 


COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Fifty-eighth session
Item 13 of the provisional agenda

RIGHTS OF THE CHILD


Written statement* submitted by the European Federation of Road Traffic Crash Victims (FEVR),
a non-governmental organization on the Roster


The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31.


[12 January 2002]



Road safety of children

Situation in Latin America

The present situation of traffic in the world clearly shows how the rights vulnerable road users are and how the different groups of people compare in the everyday increasing violence.

Believing that a democratic concept of civic security means the implementation of those public policies which assure to everybody the real exercise of his rights, F.A.V.A.T. (member of FEVR) is convinced that concrete solutions for the protection of children in the streets cannot be delayed anymore.

In the western political concept which prevails from the second half of last century both in America and Europe, the State has the obligation to ensure that the rights of some people does not affect those of others´. Thus one cannot continue to protect the systematic illegal activities of drivers to the detriment of pedestrians, and particularly of children.

According to this concept of road safety, the Civil Association "Familiares y Víctimas de Accidentes de Tránsito" (Road Accidents Relatives and Victims) wants to eradicate the causes of the last years' alarming official statistics. One of the most important causes of violent deaths both in Argentina and America are indeed road accidents.

Unfortunately, it is impossible to ignore the increasing ratio of injured children, which nowadays amounts to 20% of all the victims. This tragedy, which seriously affects children under 18 years is our concern because of their high level of vulnerability and because their right to live and their right to security is attacked.

According to the officials statistics, only in Buenos Aires, every day about 40 people suffer road accidents, at least 8 of whom are under 18 years. Thus, children and adolescents represent one of the main risk groups.

We are talking about thousands of kids each year, whose suffering has not been considered enough nor analysed. It is highly regrettable that in our country road accidents are the first cause of death for children above one year and for adolescents. Thus, according to the official data from ´96, on a total of 177.000 children injured who required medical attention, 17.700 remain seriously injured. It is a veiled catastrophe, but people seem to be immunized or anaesthetized against this reality.

There is another reality behind this tragic situation, which has not improved since 1995: one out of four kids that survive an accident suffers either physical or psychological consequences, according to statistics from paediatric trauma.

An example of the negation of human rights, there are the remembrance plates on the front of Santa María Madre del Pueblo Church (located in humble neighbourhood in the province of Buenos Aires) for children who died. Since a long time its inhabitants have raised the problem road safety in that area, specially in front of the school and the dispensary, which are along a main road with heavy traffic. What makes the situation so very dangerous is that drivers don't even stop at traffic lights because of the fear of being robbed when they stop. Since the nineteenth century, security policy is based on the concept of "conservative order". This has created discriminatory attitudes which link poor people to criminals and considers the inhabitants of a humble neighbourhood as some kind of a second class citizen, who can live without traffic lights because their lives have less value than those who live in middle and high class neighbourhoods, and are less significant than the fear of the drivers.

The study of road accidents –and specially of the causes of everyday accidents- is a concrete way of tackling the security and violence drama in the city. Civil servants have to protect civil rights. If innocent lives are lost due to the lack of action of those who are responsible for road infrastructure and the enforcement of regulations, the right to safety is being seriously affected.

Road accidents imply the highest ratio of children mortality both in the Industrialized and in the Third World: in developed countries, because of competitivity and industrialization; in underdeveloped ones, because of poverty and lack of prevention.

Given that the State has the duty to educate kids from every social class, and that children have the right to learn, which is a warranty of the right to security and to life, our association declares its support to eliminate the concept of the concurrent guilty (this means that both the victim and the driver are responsible for the accident) when children under 7 years are involved in road accidents and require insurance companies to pay immediately all the necessary expenses to prevent deaths or irreversible injuries.

F.A.V.A.T. proposes:

- Installation of traffic offence detectors by means of photographic control in school areas and children recreation zones.
- Installation of traffic lights in these areas.
- Control of games for children above all for driving games and their publicity.
- Implementation of a real and effective traffic education in primary and secondary schools.
- Suspension of the driving license for those who committed serious traffic offences against children and cancellation if repeated.
- Make people serve penalties, however insignificants they may seem.

Situation in Europe

The rights of life, body integrity and health of the children are often badly respected in the field of the road traffic. Indeed in the Member States of the Economic Commission of the United Nations for Europe, every year more than 17.000 children are killed on the road before their 18 th year. Most of these deaths could have been easily avoided. These children account for approximately 10% of the total number of killed on the road whereas this proportion is 20% for the Latin America.

This relatively low proportion in Europe is mainly due to a lower exposure of children to the road risks. For example, in many European countries the proportion of children accompanied to school has passed from 20% to 90% during the last 20 years. The increase in road danger led their parents and teachers to restrict their mobility, their outdoor activities and their independence. This confinement of the children generate negative consequences on their mental as well as on their physical health.

We know that the behaviour of the children is characterized by impulsiveness, need for movement, panic, limited field of vision and inability to fully interpret what they see. They only partially understand the words and the concepts of road education, let alone those of abstract signals. They are not able to elaborate the available information on the traffic situation in due time, in order to take the correct decisions (For example: cross now or wait). In other words, before 16 years, the children are not able to face modern traffic; education and training can hardly improve these physiological characteristics.

In spite of these limitations, it is important to teach children the principles the road safety, in the pre-school establishments, the primary and secondary schools as well as within the framework of the extra-school activities. It is also useful that the parents make them as visible as possible on the road, during day time by dressing them with bright colours, at night by providing them with retro- reflective elements.

Therefore the responsibility for the safety of the children falls mainly on the motorized drivers and not on the children. It is the duty of the authorities to take the necessary safety measures for them, requiring drivers to pay their greatest attention in the presence of children, by laying out infrastructures and by regulating the traffic in a suitable way. There exist many measures to decrease the number and seriousness of accidents. One of most effective is the respect of speed limitations, in particular in urban environment. In fact a reduced speed gives the driver more time to see the child, reduces the braking distance, and in the event of impact reduces the seriousness the injuries. Another measure is the fight against drink and drive. Indeed alcohol is present in more than 40% of the fatal accidents. It is thus essential to carry out regular controls of blood alcohol content of the drivers.

______________

*This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting non-governmental organization(s).

 

foto6
HOME | SITE MAP | SEARCH | INDEX | DOCUMENTS | TREATIES | MEETINGS | PRESS | STATEMENTS

foto5



© Copyright 1996-2000

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Geneva, Switzerland